mantis2k4
20 posts
msg #39963
- Ignore mantis2k4 |
1/5/2006 10:01:34 AM
I was just playing with rsi(2) when i got the idea to try stochastic(2). Pretty much the same thing and the results look just as promising.
stochastic(2) %k crossed above stochastic(2) %d
stochastic(2) %d is below 4
Average Volume(90) is above 30000
and close is between 1 and 250
|
glgene
616 posts
msg #39966
- Ignore glgene |
1/5/2006 10:15:24 AM
I get 0 matches with your script. What is your count?
|
mantis2k4
20 posts
msg #39967
- Ignore mantis2k4 |
1/5/2006 10:22:49 AM
stochastic(2) %k crossed above stochastic(2) %d
stochastic(2) %d is below 4
Average Volume(90) is above 30000
and close is between 1 and 250
and date offset is 3
You can offset the date or try a higher number in the second line,
stochastic(2) %d is below 6
|
EWZuber
1,373 posts
msg #39989
- Ignore EWZuber |
1/5/2006 4:36:28 PM
I have played with stochastics a lot and found (5,3) to be the most accurate for my purposes however I encourage experimentation with other timings.
Please keep us posted on your outcomes.
|
BFreshour
139 posts
msg #39992
- Ignore BFreshour |
1/5/2006 5:55:02 PM
EZWuber, slow stochastics 5,3 is brilliant for brief holding periods. I like slow stochastics 39,1 for longer periods of time and really seeing how a stock is moving.
|
EWZuber
1,373 posts
msg #40005
- Ignore EWZuber |
1/6/2006 2:48:52 AM
BFreshour,for determining the longer period accumulation and distribution phases of a stock I use the same stochastic timing on charts with a longer periodicity, like 3 to 10 year Monthly and Quarterly Charts.
|
as214
184 posts
msg #40006
- Ignore as214 |
1/6/2006 4:25:43 AM
When using %,3 settings does it matter if you use fast or slow stochatics? Which is better? Thank you.
|
as214
184 posts
msg #40007
- Ignore as214 |
1/6/2006 4:26:26 AM
5,3 settings is what i meant in the above post.
|
EWZuber
1,373 posts
msg #40017
- Ignore EWZuber |
1/6/2006 3:05:43 PM
I use slow stochastics as fast stochastics are too volitile for me.
|