glider
59 posts
msg #39581
- Ignore glider |
12/15/2005 4:47:36 PM
Does anyone have a filter which mirrors Matthew Claassen's Relative Average Oscillator which was taken off this site about a year ago. Or if a filter already exitsts, point me in the right direction.
Thanks
Glider
|
BFreshour
139 posts
msg #39582
- Ignore BFreshour |
12/15/2005 6:28:33 PM
Why was it removed? There isn't much information on it available from the internet either... (at least not Google).
|
BFreshour
139 posts
msg #39584
- Ignore BFreshour |
12/15/2005 6:54:24 PM
My interpretation of the article found here: http://www.shrewdinvesting.com/cat_content.asp?contentid=283&catid=136
I don't think it's correct. It seems like the values still need to be normalized between 2 numbers, eg 50, -50 for RAV30 and 150, -150 for RAVHJ
|
drew9
171 posts
msg #39589
- Ignore drew9 |
12/15/2005 11:49:24 PM
BFreshour, thanks for your attempt at the RAV filter. I certainly hope you continue to work on this as I originally found RAV to be better than anything I have seen in the last year. Keep up the good work! Here is the announcement that was given about the topic:
"stockfetcher 11/29/2004 1:09:34 PM
Attention: Matthew Claassen's content is no longer available on StockFetcher. Matthew has closed TheTechicalView.net to work with an institutional research firm. Addtionally, proprietary measures developed and provided by Matthew Claassen are no longer available on StockFetcher.
Thank you,
StockFetcher.com Support
support@stockfetcher.com"
Regards,
Drew
|
glider
59 posts
msg #39590
- Ignore glider |
12/16/2005 1:20:32 AM
BFreshour,
Thanks for the effort to duplicate the RAV filter.
I agree with drew9, it was one of the best around.
Keep up the good work.
glider
|