rafting101
4 posts
msg #159926
- Ignore rafting101 |
12/27/2022 2:09:37 AM
I am a paid subscriber.
Many stocks do not adjust to splits, and it messes up my screens.
Here is a quick way to find many stocks with this issue:
Is there a plan to fix it?
I think that it is easy to fix automatically, since splits are public data.
|
nibor100
1,031 posts
msg #159956
- Ignore nibor100 |
1/4/2023 11:09:07 AM
@rafting101,
In view of your most recent post I'm going to reply to your other posts separately:
a. I ran your filter this morning and it returns many stocks that don't appear to have a split problem on SF such as AMTD.
I'm not sure many users want to (quick?) sort thru 93 stocks to find a few that have a split reporting problem....
b. However, in the past, when I've noticed such a data problem on SF I use the "Contact Us" at the bottom of the browser window to inform them of it and it usually gets fixed in a couple of days.
c. SF gets its stock data from a third party, like most stock sw sites, and all of them occasionally miss splits and changes to the SP500 make-up, etc.
d. I don't believe SF support will respond to any Forum posts if they even read them, so we have to contact them directly.
Hope this helps,
Ed S.
|
rafting101
4 posts
msg #159966
- Ignore rafting101 |
1/6/2023 7:34:43 AM
I see a lot of errors in the data, regarding split. Using my filter above, I checked the first 10 results (just to try) and I can see that 8 out of them are not adjusted to the latest splits:
HALL
BIOR
RXMDD
IRON
COSM
PHCF
PSHG
MDGS
My filter is very good at catching these errors.
SF should fix this...
|
nibor100
1,031 posts
msg #159979
- Ignore nibor100 |
1/7/2023 2:43:25 AM
Your filter's error rate, based on your last post is 20%....
Stock data from SF's data provider for the 12,480 stocks with a close above 1, is less than 1% at .007...
How badly your personal scans are affected....unknown
Ed S.
|