nibor100
1,031 posts
msg #158721
- Ignore nibor100 |
3/4/2022 11:44:56 AM
@xarlor,
In the filter below, I’m using the SF Min function instead of a third Set statement for combining two variables for a True test.
I’m hoping this will allow us to extend complicated filters a little bit further before they fail to execute due to nesting levels.
Do you hav a readily available filter that is right at the SF too complex to run level that you could post for me to test with?
Thanks,
Ed S.
|
push5280
201 posts
msg #158722
- Ignore push5280 |
3/4/2022 1:19:37 PM
Ed,
Try the filter I posted in this thread if you will..
https://www.stockfetcher.com/forums/Filter-Exchange/Trend-Trader-Strategy/158384
|
xarlor
581 posts
msg #158724
- Ignore xarlor |
3/4/2022 2:03:16 PM
I'm sure I can find one. Do we know what the limit for set statements is between standard and advanced?
|
nibor100
1,031 posts
msg #158725
- Ignore nibor100 |
3/4/2022 2:55:42 PM
I don't know the limit for either Subscription level but I think the limit is the number of Set statements that are nested as I believe if there is no nesting we can have very many Set statements.
Thanks
Ed S.
|
xarlor
581 posts
msg #158726
- Ignore xarlor |
3/4/2022 3:31:51 PM
Okay, here is a Fibonacci filter that should trigger an advanced subscription. Let me know if it's too complex for testing and I'll look for something smaller.
|
Cheese
1,374 posts
msg #158727
- Ignore Cheese |
3/4/2022 3:34:20 PM
https://www.stockfetcher.com/forums/General-Discussion/A-possible-true-false-logic-alternative/158721
============================================
@nibor100
I think a couple of filters on this page might be candidates for your test ?
https://www.stockfetcher.com/forums/Filter-Exchange/Bottom-Filter/147471/20
KSK8 4/30/2019 4:01:50 PM
SAFeTRADE 4/30/2019 6:11:05 PM
|
nibor100
1,031 posts
msg #158763
- Ignore nibor100 |
3/9/2022 12:30:43 PM
@push5280,
Using the SF Min function I was only able to get a little more info from your filter but could not clear the complexity hang up issue.
Ed S.
|
nibor100
1,031 posts
msg #158813
- Ignore nibor100 |
3/14/2022 11:11:02 AM
@xarlor,
That Fibonacci filter runs in my advanced subscription with no changes required.
Thanks anyway,
Ed S
|
xarlor
581 posts
msg #158816
- Ignore xarlor |
3/14/2022 3:39:49 PM
@nibor
I misunderstood your request. I thought you were testing basic vs advanced filters. I don't have any filters that fail to run in SF due to complexity as I delete any that break. I'll let you know if I come across any, though!
|