| jpistell 123 posts
 msg #33829
 - Ignore jpistell
 | 11/7/2004 9:30:27 PM 
 Here's a fun one, I call it "Zig - Zag".
 
 
 
 
 Trading Set-up.
 Zig = CMF(14) 52 week high
 Zag = CMF(14) 52 week low
 
 The Play by play....
 THE ZIG: CMF(14) 52 week high
 Traders are over-running the security. News is usually out, Sellers are hard to find and Market Makers are net short ((cmf(14)at 52 week high)). Time and time again, I see them regain control of the trading and (attempt to) return the price back to where they can go long and turn a profit. (note: This is why Gaps nearly always fill.)
 
 THE ZAG: CMF(14) 52 week low
 After the 52week CMF high, I frequently see about a 20-30 day window to wash out the short term traders and allow the MM'ers to square up. The ZAG, shows up about 30 days after the ZIG which usually sets up a bounce. This 1st bounce is often a nice place for a "pilot buy" to watch a security. Extra opportunity comes when the ZAG bounce fails and the stock falls to a new near term low. This signature is seen with a CMF positive divergence and is a new opp. to buy some more and then set those stops fairly tight
 
 It's a KISS scipt with a very small number of hits, and these hits produce an excellent gains to losses ratio.
 
 Sorry to be so wordy...
 Joe
 p.s. careful of IPOs they're to be ignored.
 
 
 
 | 
| jpistell 123 posts
 msg #33830
 - Ignore jpistell
 | 11/7/2004 10:03:24 PM 
 Use Date offset 1,2,3,4,5,etc... to find a set up that you like.  I think XOMA here at $2 looks interesting. (date offset = 3) Possible gap fill into the low $3's (assuming more bad news dosn't kill it).
 
 
 
 | 
| yepher 359 posts
 msg #33831
 - Ignore yepher
 | 11/7/2004 11:43:13 PM 
 jpistell,
 
 Interesting filter I like your approach.
 
 I hope you don't mind my saying but I don't really agree with your call on "XOMA" due to the higher volume on the low days but I guess 20 days from now we will know :)
 
 Thanks for the contribution it is a nice filter.
 
 
 
 
 | 
| jpistell 123 posts
 msg #33833
 - Ignore jpistell
 | 11/8/2004 8:32:40 AM 
 yepher,
 Ya, I agree on XOMA's lousey last few bars. What we have is (at this moment) is what "could be" a rare negative divrg. where price at its recent low and yet the volume based osc. has made a new low. This significanlty tilts the the likely outcome more twoards more lower lows.
 
 With these set ups, should there be a bounce, it'll be short lived, that'll set up a return to this low price on far lighter vol (aka higher CMF).  I still see that uncovered gap calling for higher prices.   Lastly, rising vol. with diminishing a ATR (aka bollingerband squeeze) sets up a break (in either direction).
 
 IMO, buystop > $2.00 with sell stop $0.05 under it.  Thats my kind of trade.
 
 
 
 | 
| jpistell 123 posts
 msg #33839
 - Ignore jpistell
 | 11/8/2004 10:52:29 AM 
 I'm in at $2.00.
 BBH is negative, stop is tight.
 
 
 
 | 
| jpistell 123 posts
 msg #33877
 - Ignore jpistell
 | 11/10/2004 11:09:17 PM 
 Arrg... Stopped out XOMA yesterday and its up 13% the next day. Someone shoot me.
 
 
 
 | 
| petrolpeter 439 posts
 msg #33879
 - Ignore petrolpeter
 | 11/11/2004 1:07:00 PM 
 I show XOMA on two bottom fishers;
 and
 Date 11/09.
 
 
 
 | 
| jpistell 123 posts
 msg #33880
 - Ignore jpistell
 | 11/11/2004 1:56:22 PM 
 cool! I love bottom fisher scripts,  I'll look them over tonight!
 
 many thnx,
 Joe
 
 
 
 | 
| TheRumpledOne 6,529 posts
 msg #33888
 - Ignore TheRumpledOne
 | 11/12/2004 12:02:45 AM 
 I noticed some new names posting.   Some of you may not be familiar with:
 
 
 
 
 Of course, add your own price/volume parameters to find the stocks you like.
 
 If you only like uptrending stocks:
 
 
 
 
 Look for your favorite stocks to appear on this list and then load the boat!
 
 MAY ALL YOUR FILLS BE COMPLETE.
 
 
 
 |