TheRumpledOne 6,411 posts msg #50773 - Ignore TheRumpledOne |
3/31/2007 6:31:21 PM
The reason I update the filter weekly is because I want to keep stocks that the filter picked up the first week of the year on the list.
The idea is to find the NEXT NTRI - a stock that grows 10x or more in a year.
|
TheRumpledOne 6,411 posts msg #50927 - Ignore TheRumpledOne |
4/7/2007 10:52:28 PM
CURRENT VERSION - UPDATED WEEKLY
|
TheRumpledOne 6,411 posts msg #51066 - Ignore TheRumpledOne |
4/13/2007 6:22:52 PM
CURRENT VERSION - UPDATED WEEKLY
|
TheRumpledOne 6,411 posts msg #51098 - Ignore TheRumpledOne modified |
4/14/2007 8:24:27 PM
CURRENT VERSION - UPDATED WEEKLY
SOMETHING CHANGED AT STOCKFETCHER or there's a bug.
The original NEXT NTRI filters are NOT working.
This is a STRIPPED DOWN VERSION.
|
nikoschopen 2,824 posts msg #51100 - Ignore nikoschopen |
4/14/2007 8:53:51 PM
TRO,
Since ure such a dominant figure around here, I would like to enlist ure help to get the StockFetcher people to implement the "OR" function and the "IF" conditional. It's ridiculous that they still haven't hardcoded these features after all this time and expect us to write them out manually. I just posted my gripes on the Comments & Request section. Please add your own as well, which I'm sure is no smaller than mine. And for those who are reading this post, please do you part by making your gripes known publicly. I'm literally fed up with StocFetcher's halfass stance to our concerns (excuse my french).
|
TheRumpledOne 6,411 posts msg #51103 - Ignore TheRumpledOne modified |
4/14/2007 9:09:10 PM
I rebuilt the filter, piece by piece, and it seems to work now.
Well, at least it worked?!?!?!
|
TheRumpledOne 6,411 posts msg #51107 - Ignore TheRumpledOne |
4/14/2007 9:24:37 PM
TRO,
Since ure such a dominant figure around here, I would like to enlist ure help to get the StockFetcher people to implement the "OR" function and the "IF" conditional. It's ridiculous that they still haven't hardcoded these features after all this time and expect us to write them out manually. I just posted my gripes on the Comments & Request section. Please add your own as well, which I'm sure is no smaller than mine. And for those who are reading this post, please do you part by making your gripes known publicly. I'm literally fed up with StocFetcher's halfass stance to our concerns (excuse my french).
==================
Niko, I am no "dominant figure". I am just another paying customer just like you.
Yes, it is a limitation NOT having the "OR" and "IF" functions.
But, I created a work around and posted it FOR FREE. So you can get what you want.
The problem SF would have if they give us the "OR" is that the number of conditions grow as you string ORs together. 1x2, 1x2x3, 1x2x3x4, etc...
ONE user could possibly LOCK UP THE SERVERS with a filter that contained too many ORs.
But when we code them manually, the processing is different, so no LOCK UPS.
Overall, SF is very attentive to our needs. Sometimes SF may take longer than we like but there are not many other companies that respond to their customers as well as SF.
You know I have reputation for getting kicked off forums for posting events, free code, methods, indicators, opinions, etc... I don't HOLD BACK or BACK DOWN. But I really don't feel the need to badger SF over ORs and IFs since I have an alternative.
|
TheRumpledOne 6,411 posts msg #51265 - Ignore TheRumpledOne modified |
4/21/2007 12:14:57 PM
Looks like things are working normally.
|
TheRumpledOne 6,411 posts msg #51358 - Ignore TheRumpledOne |
4/27/2007 4:22:44 PM
Looks like things are working normally.
|
TheRumpledOne 6,411 posts msg #51433 - Ignore TheRumpledOne |
5/5/2007 2:18:02 PM
Looks like things are working normally.
|