heyen 124 posts msg #42118 - Ignore heyen |
3/16/2006 2:56:29 AM
Respect!
|
craigk 24 posts msg #42120 - Ignore craigk |
3/16/2006 4:35:58 AM
Thanks for working to a $5 plus filter. ($20+ in this case) I am so tired of looking a stocks with bad fundamentals. Especially, the stocks that are loosing money and the execs are pulling in 250K+. Robbers
Lots of Green! What is the filters name? Maybe your filter should be called Green filter or like the 60 James Bond goldfinger. GoldFilter. You have to say it like the theme song to the movie Goldfinger to get the full impact.
GoldFilter It will be instesting to see the filter on up and down markets.
Craig
|
TheRumpledOne 6,411 posts msg #42122 - Ignore TheRumpledOne modified |
3/16/2006 8:04:45 AM
Riggs... in "your" filter above (that I reformatted ), you have ccval/moval/wrval < 5 but in the other filter you have ccval/moval/wrval < 30 and some other different selection criteria.
Which version (80-30 or 80-5) is the one you are following?
And remember, IT'S NOT WHAT YOU TRADE, IT'S HOW YOU TRADE IT!
|
WALLSTREETGENIUS 983 posts msg #42125 - Ignore WALLSTREETGENIUS modified |
3/16/2006 12:25:18 PM
Avery -
Please stop your LAME "formatting." It's not necessary as you can CLEARLY see! As for the "Warm" 30-5, those are two completely different filters. Remember, it is no longer YOUR "Warm-Display," I have turned it into several dominate filters. So when you see them "Below 5," or "Below-30," there is a calculated reason for that, meaning....much research has gone into the "DIFFERENT" filters. Kind of obvious isn't it? So you're wasting your time re-doing Perfection don't ya think????
- RIGGS -
|
TheRumpledOne 6,411 posts msg #42144 - Ignore TheRumpledOne modified |
3/16/2006 8:14:29 PM
Riggs:
By reformatting, I meant putting similiar code in the same section...
plots together, columns together, set statements together, selection statements together, etc...
Much easier to read the code that way.
Also helps one to see redundant code, errors, etc... and to find what you're looking for and modify/enhance it.
"It's not my WARM DISPLAY"... that's funny.
I share my code with all to use as they see fit.
Hopefully, I help someone make a profit.
I guess I did, huh Riggs?
|
WALLSTREETGENIUS 983 posts msg #42179 - Ignore WALLSTREETGENIUS modified |
3/18/2006 12:04:40 PM
Avery you said.....
""It's not my WARM DISPLAY"... that's funny.
I share my code with all to use as they see fit.
Hopefully, I help someone make a profit.
I guess I did, huh Riggs?"
________________________
Now that's comedy! LOL.....
TRO, you didn't even want me to share "Warm" with
anyone here at the forum!
Have you forgotten this?...."I'm trusting you riggs!"
After YOUR version of "warm" collapst, "I'm" the one who "shared it" with this forum community! Then revised it. The version of "warm" YOU shared did NOT include "rsval" or adval." R-E-M-E-M-B-E-R?????
So please spare us the "Good Samaritan" routine okay? ROFLMAO!!!!
RIGGS.
|
rtucker 318 posts msg #42180 - Ignore rtucker modified |
3/18/2006 12:15:28 PM
"s
|
WALLSTREETGENIUS 983 posts msg #42181 - Ignore WALLSTREETGENIUS |
3/18/2006 12:34:31 PM
rtucker -
I think you meant to say..."prodjects do COLLAPSE sometimes."
At anyrate, the point you are missing is...GOOD "prodjects" usually experience success BEFORE they "collapse."
speaking of "good prodjects".....
RIGGS
|
rtucker 318 posts msg #42182 - Ignore rtucker modified |
3/18/2006 12:40:56 PM
f
|
WALLSTREETGENIUS 983 posts msg #42183 - Ignore WALLSTREETGENIUS |
3/18/2006 12:53:14 PM
rtucker -
Of course you don't...you'd rather do your usual "Hit N Run" while the likes of alf44 & niko, aren't here to co-sign for you. We both know you're out-manned when it comes down to you and I don't we? LOL...
RIGGS
|