nikoschopen
2,824 posts
msg #62199
- Ignore nikoschopen |
5/6/2008 4:07:33 AM
Being a minimalist, I believe the less the number of columns the better. Hence here's the same filter with only two columns. As with my previous filters, you'll find a value of 1 for buy and -1 for sell.
|
chetron
2,817 posts
msg #62202
- Ignore chetron |
5/6/2008 6:50:08 AM
OF COURSE YOU KNOW, NIKOS. YOU HAVE EXCEEDED THE LIMITATIONS OF A STANDARD SUBSCRIPTION. LOL.
|
nikoschopen
2,824 posts
msg #62216
- Ignore nikoschopen |
5/6/2008 11:31:46 AM
LOL... Been there and done that, haven't we? But I also found a cure as well, no?
|
chetron
2,817 posts
msg #62222
- Ignore chetron |
5/6/2008 12:03:13 PM
VERY NICE, THANX NIKO.
|
dhhus10
5 posts
msg #63834
- Ignore dhhus10 |
6/16/2008 11:32:51 PM
niko,
great filter, but under debug your line - set(go_bears,count(roc(5,1)<0,1)*-1) show error. don't know if this would make a difference.
|
nikoschopen
2,824 posts
msg #63842
- Ignore nikoschopen |
6/17/2008 12:22:37 AM
Hi,
I'm fully aware of that issue, but you can rest assured that this is not a script error because it "debugged" fine under the now antiquated SF interface. However, if it bugs you too much, you can assign the negative integer to a variable and it should be bug free, as in the first three lines below. (BTW this filter is the sole property of Chetron & Co.)
|