WALLSTREETGENIUS
983 posts
msg #62670
- Ignore WALLSTREETGENIUS
modified |
5/15/2008 9:00:51 PM
"Jawstreetgenius:Could have gotten ESLR in the 8.20s all afternoon as well as most other solars with volume in the millions,it was the play of the week that % wise engulfed the market."
_________________________________
This just cracks me up! Boy, I'm sure glad you told us that we could have bought these stocks "all afternoon"....again poindexster, you couldn't enter a trade during market hours on the "CNBC CHALLENGE" It's only Pre-market and after hours! So tell us all how MARY4MONEY was going to beat everyone to the punch on the very day the news hit the media? Can you do that tough guy? Can you?...that's why CNBC does this, so geniuses like me don't wrap-up these contests from the very beginning.
I had a 100,000 share lead on everyone in the Jim Cramer "Mad Money challenge", because you could trade intraday on his. I even told all of you to take a look and vist the site for yourselves. But about 2-weeks into the contest, my wife and I separated, and I became preoccupied and quit the whole thing. So in closing, I would like you to (again) have you READ everything before you engage in sophisticated conversations here at SF!
Geeze...
THEMIGHTYONE
|
rtucker
318 posts
msg #62676
- Ignore rtucker
modified |
5/15/2008 10:43:52 PM
Riggs,
Check out this support group for help. Good Luck !
" Fund_managers_ who_peruse_ internet_ stock_sites_to_ heckle_posters.com"
|
WALLSTREETGENIUS
983 posts
msg #62678
- Ignore WALLSTREETGENIUS
modified |
5/15/2008 11:29:22 PM
Riggs,
Check out this support group for help. Good Luck !
" Fund_managers_ who_peruse_ internet_ stock_sites_to_ heckle_posters.com"
______________________
"heckle" them?....is that was you read into it Tucker? I thought I was doing a good job at BULLYING the guy myself. Damn, I better buckle down and get serious now, because I thought I did everything but take his milk $money$. Thanks for bringing this to my attention Tuck...you'll see a whole new Riggs from here on out.
RIGGS
|
alf44
2,025 posts
msg #62680
- Ignore alf44
modified |
5/16/2008 12:49:53 AM
RIGGS,
I posted on your "Elder Ray" thread that you were BACK...and actually posting with "a new sense of civility"...
...apparently......I spoke too soon !!!
Oh well...
Regards,
alf44
|
WALLSTREETGENIUS
983 posts
msg #62682
- Ignore WALLSTREETGENIUS |
5/16/2008 2:02:06 AM
Wow Alf...I cant begin to tell you how that saddens me. NOT! Look, I found a rat (M4M) and I flushed him out! Then some dork comes to his rescue with zero "0" merrit. So then tell me...where's my crime? And BTW Alf, who deemed YOU the moral majority? Are you kidding me man? I could cut-n-paste a whole book on you friend! Come on man...you don't want me to jump on that Military flight do you? LMAO...
RIGGS
|
petrolpeter
439 posts
msg #62684
- Ignore petrolpeter
modified |
5/16/2008 4:52:48 AM
CSIQ is in here
and here
,two broad based filters but I will look at every chart,sometimes 3 times for a shot at a top 10 pick.After the gap of CSIQ,ESLR laid a hammer in sympathy
and then gapped also.
Here's the finished product
although not really looking for a gap but another green bar.
So MFM,what venue led you to these solars this week?
|
chetron
2,817 posts
msg #62686
- Ignore chetron |
5/16/2008 7:26:35 AM
thank you, wsg for exposing the rats, but even rats are gods creatures. can you try to elimate them without the hate?
tia chetron
|
nikoschopen
2,824 posts
msg #62706
- Ignore nikoschopen |
5/16/2008 1:47:07 PM
Quote from chetron:
thank you, wsg for exposing the rats, but even rats are gods creatures.
I've been doing this long enough to know that there are no good vermins in this game. I'm sure even god would have had second thought about these altruistic SOB's with self-serving ulterior motives. Be that as it may, WSG should understand that "in-ure-face" animosity doesn't always work, especially with these god's second-hand creatures. It's an exercises in futility.
|
betyerbottomdollar
169 posts
msg #62707
- Ignore betyerbottomdollar |
5/16/2008 2:37:17 PM
Oh for chrissake you guys...I am away for a coupla months enjoying my central american holiday and return to the forum to find it has turned into something I could be reading in Yahoo!
WSG, I think everyone who has read half a post of M4M knows he is 90% bs, but most of us get a kick out of reading them anyway. This thread of yours, valiant as it may be, reads something a bit painful... Thanks for looking out for us but regardless of what his numbers are, I donīt need ya to tell me M4M is usually full of it. And certainly not with such a harsh attitude.
So, hopefully that is all over with and we can get back to discussing more important topics...like the fact a butterfly consists of neither butter nor a fly.
Discuss.
|
boswellrw
20 posts
msg #62729
- Ignore boswellrw |
5/17/2008 2:31:00 AM
Strangely enough, butterflies were originally called Flutterbies, I much more appropriate name. Not sure why or when it changed.
|