MARY4MONEY
806 posts
msg #87202
- Ignore MARY4MONEY
modified |
1/27/2010 9:58:48 PM
I should be working for Goldman Sachs -- or better yet -- running it?
|
swiftsailing
5 posts
msg #87213
- Ignore swiftsailing |
1/28/2010 12:47:02 AM
Not anyone who uses multiple zeros in place of the letter o.
|
jrbikes
624 posts
msg #87218
- Ignore jrbikes
modified |
1/28/2010 2:23:52 AM
There are 92 stocks on that list, you buy all 92, dont think so! got to narrow it down, how? figure it out tommorrow!
www.shellstockreview.com
come on guys, help me out here!
o.k., now you register for this website and get started, yes, its that easy!
www.shellstocks.com--this is the one from old!
Im done for the night, good bye all!
|
mesayah
658 posts
msg #87219
- Ignore mesayah |
1/28/2010 2:54:46 AM
YOU SHOULD FURTHER STUDY THE CHARACTERISTICS IN PREVIOUS DAYS VOLUME & PRICE LEADUP. ALSO LOOK AT PARABOLIC LEADUPS. Find any similarities at all of the stocks that pop quick and the stocks that take months. in fact everyone should look. i already said i think the .02 pop the most.
|
jrbikes
624 posts
msg #87221
- Ignore jrbikes
modified |
1/28/2010 3:03:56 AM
Then copy the filter and just look for price in the .02 range, say .015 to .025, that would eliminate half of them!
now go back and study this, the MACD(12,26,9) is rising, but is below 0, so you have the Divergence, but not above 0, now you look at the RSI(14) and it is above 50, now you look at the SMA 9,18,27, when they are lined up in that order, thats it, or you can look at the 4,9,13 play with that and get back too me, I will be glad to research in tandem!
Got CTDB with this set up! its killer! I dont think its done yet!
But its on a 3 month chart, it seems to work best in that time frame, but cross reference with the 2 month and 1 month charts as well!
Bye
|
mystiq
650 posts
msg #87222
- Ignore mystiq
modified |
1/28/2010 3:27:12 AM
how about this:
|
trendscanner
265 posts
msg #87228
- Ignore trendscanner
modified |
1/28/2010 6:12:28 AM
M4M, for the periods you selected, Nov 19, 2009 through Jan 27,2010, and especially the April 13, 2009 through Jan 27, 2010, period, there are a huge number of filters that would show positive results - because the overall market went up during that period. For the April 13, 2009 and Jan 27, 2010 period, simply picking 60 stocks at random would probably have given a winning basket of stocks. No filter needed.
Also, when trading thinly traded pink and OTCBB stocks, you can get killed on the spread, which can be up to 50%. I don't think SF can factor in losses on the spread.
I think this, like many filters, may work well in a bull market, especially after a huge sell off like in early 2009. But in a bear market or even sideways trending market, I think there's a lot of money that could be lost using this approach.
|
karennma
8,057 posts
msg #87298
- Ignore karennma |
1/28/2010 1:04:09 PM
Anybody, besides M4M, who could've called NFLX meteoric rise this morning, raise your hand.
And tell us HOW!!
??
|
TheRumpledOne
6,411 posts
msg #87303
- Ignore TheRumpledOne
modified |
1/28/2010 1:11:29 PM
|
gmg733
788 posts
msg #87318
- Ignore gmg733 |
1/28/2010 2:10:33 PM
Could have to do with RSI(2). Have a look.
;)
|