chetron
2,817 posts
msg #83361
- Ignore chetron
modified |
11/23/2009 6:58:55 AM
FInAL THOUGHT....
FOR SHORTS....
|
chetron
2,817 posts
msg #84346
- Ignore chetron |
12/12/2009 8:55:49 PM
Kevin_in_GA
- Ignore Kevin_in_GA 11/23/2009 6:51:23 AM
Chet:
Performance restrictions - can't see the output of the last few filters you posted here. I think I get what you are trying to do from the code, though.
****************
SORRY KEVIN, I FORGOT TO ANSWER THIS, BECAUSE I NEEDED TO WRAP CUSTOM BOLLINGER BANDS AROUND A VALUE THAT WAS DERIVED FROM CUSTOM BOLLINGER BANDS, THE FILTER BECAME AN ADVANCED SUB FILTER.
HTH
|
Kevin_in_GA
4,599 posts
msg #84355
- Ignore Kevin_in_GA |
12/13/2009 11:58:28 AM
Sounds complicated ...
I think that I am coming to the position that indicators on top of other indicators (rather than price) are moving too far into the realm of the academic.
I'm cool with Bollinger Bands, pivots, MA crossovers, etc - all derived from price action and naturally plotted on the price rather than below it. These should have more intrinsic value (i'm oversimplfying, but you get the idea).
|